3 ms·
Fyi: The printer is $130,000. I'm not saying it isn't great, but it's not exactly for home use. Or if it IS for your home, you have an amazing home, can I plea
by analognoise 10y ago
Fyi: The printer is $130,000.
I'm not saying it isn't great, but it's not exactly for home use. Or if it IS for your home, you have an amazing home, can I please come live with you and use your printer?
- protomyth 10y agoI've often thought that a new version of the Copy Shop (e.g. Kinkos) would probably be a better start for mass 3D printing because the machine could be much better than the home model and people really don't need to use it that frequently yet. $130,000 might be good enough for that use.
- analognoise 10y agoA rapid prototype version of Kinkos. I love the idea, I wonder how much copies would have to cost to make it economical to buy something like this. More likely a machine shop would expand their capability by adding one of these.
- drewda 10y agoI've seen multiple UPS Stores with 3D printers on-site. (Granted I do live in the SF Bay Area.)
- macavity23 10y agoAgreed - and I think it will stay that way. Right now most people find it too much expense and trouble to keep a photo-quality color (2D) inkjet at home, and would rather pay per-photo at Kinkos/Walgreens. I don't see any signs of this changing. I think 3D printers will go the same way. How many little plastic parts does the average consumer ever want to print? Probably not enough, and not rapidly enough, to justify a big purchase, when they can pay per-item at a (physical or online) Kinkos equivalent and get a higher-quality part printed on a machine like this.
- samstave 10y agoAre you paying for the resolution or the new tech?