This is another example of a poorly written MS KnowledgeBase article. It's version 1.0, dated 2015-01-05. It apparently has not been touched in a year despite

This is another example of a poorly written MS KnowledgeBase article. It's version 1.0, dated 2015-01-05. It apparently has not been touched in a year despite at least one glaring spelling mistake. For those who want to know what's going on, see this report from the year before, complete with stack trace: * http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-performance/taskhostexe-dfpcommondll-thread-high-cpu/c16ce12f-5bc4-4f59-9e08-7404c554a8e5 http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-...