4 ms·
What's frightening is that it's specifically a police power. If the private property owner wants to enforce private rules, they should pay for private security
by regularfry 17y ago
What's frightening is that it's specifically a police power. If the private property owner wants to enforce private rules, they should pay for private security guards to do it. Why should public money be used for this?
EDIT: On further thought, it's worse. The article implies that police will have the power to remove items from people on the way to an event. That would be hideous if true. I want a corroborative source before I get too worked up about this, though.
- nicoara 17y agohere it is : http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/21/olympics2012-civil-liberties http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/21/olympics2012-civil-...
- regularfry 17y agoThat corroborates one part but not the other, more worrying (but less likely) aspect.