4 ms·
javascript:window.alert("Hello World"); Your answer perfectly illustrates my point. You focus on the wrong things. None of your distinctions or interpretation
by ThomPete 11y ago
javascript:window.alert("Hello World");
Your answer perfectly illustrates my point.
You focus on the wrong things. None of your distinctions or interpretations of what I say are wrong per-se, they are just not important distinctions.
The fact is that people can quickly build a webpage with all the bells and whistles in an environment they undertand without having to install anything or rely on dependencies to get started.
They can fiddle around, experiment with it in real time etc. they can play around with it so to speak.
It doesn't take itself too serious. It doesn't have a "guardians of the right way" saying how it can and can't be used.
You can still go to town and go crazy in making perfectly optimized code but it's not demanding that from you.
These are the important bricks in creating something that is powerful. It's ability to function as a toy for the very novice people. To easily provide them with visual feedback with assets they can relate to (cat pictures, video they saw somewhere) etc.
This is what VB had this is what HTML/CSS/JS/DOM/(PHP) has in spades. The non-judgement of the experts.
- ThomPete 11y agoDownvote me all you want. But at least have the curtesy to explain why so our argument can stand for the reader to judge.
- douche 11y agoA lot of unbelievable crap was produced by novices hacking away at Basic in an earlier era as well. The difference was you could move on to better things - Pascal, C/C++, Lisp, etc. We're stuck with this cobbled together mess of mostly broken shit in browser-land, and there is no bigger-and-better thing we can graduate to.