3 ms·
I'm all for this proposal. It's relatively unintrusive while keeping control mostly in the hands of the user. Not sure where the official RFC/comment thread fo
by verandaguy 10y ago
I'm all for this proposal. It's relatively unintrusive while keeping control mostly in the hands of the user.
Not sure where the official RFC/comment thread for this is, but pending finding that, it would be nice to half a mechanism similar to AdBlock's where a user can whitelist flash based on domain, subdomain, or directory[0].
I'm also against the idea of "trusting" the top ten most used domains. It justifies further telemetry by Google (I know, it's Chrome anyway), but more importantly, it puts those "trusted" sites in a position where they can take advantage of their positions to inject malicious or unwanted content into their Flash elements.
[0] https://i.imgur.com/fFuAwDV.png https://i.imgur.com/fFuAwDV.png