Sure, but none of that refutes my point. All you've done is point out a logical fallacy in a side comment I made, my argument didn't rely on the side comment.

Sure, but none of that refutes my point. All you've done is point out a logical fallacy in a side comment I made, my argument didn't rely on the side comment. If the bill does not in fact achieve, or cannot be proved to achieve, more transparency, then saying it promotes transparency is opinion. And my point about the mere selective choice of words in a headline being subjective still stands.