> It has a pretty serious relationship to whether or not some haskell implementation has the ability to generation objects and libraries and binaries for it. T

> It has a pretty serious relationship to whether or not some haskell implementation has the ability to generation objects and libraries and binaries for it. That's right. And as i just said, zero relationship to the question you keep failing to answer. Where are these multiple Haskell-to-readable-C implementations you tried to make up? > And it does that. So now you reversed your position again and you are claiming that Haskell can generate binaries for my system without knowing what my system is? Keep it classy. I'll let you talk yourself in circles. You don't need me for that. Start here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11708601 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11708601 (Let me know if I have to read the thread back to you again). So which is it going to be next? You did or you didn't claim that Haskell supports my platforms? Inquiring minds want to know!