3 ms·
> while lending it the HR resources of the core. "HR resources" is redundant.
by wolfgke 10y ago
> while lending it the HR resources of the core.
"HR resources" is redundant.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> HR resources" is redundant. No, its not. It does expand out to have a repeated word, but the reference is different (the HR resources -- Human Resources resources -- are resources dedicated to the Human Resources function.)
- magice 10y ago? Why is it redundant? For the love of God, why is HR redundant? Let alone the other answer ("HR" == "other engineers"), which is brilliant, the HR department is the greatest weapon a large firm can deploy. Do you want insurance in case your kids get sick? Do you want days off to relax after a month of hard work? Do you want to ensure your boss ain't making inappropriate advances? Why on earth would a smart people want to be burdened with all of those works? Why on earth would a smart people hitch non-core work onto main work hour? Why on earth would a smart person refuse to delegate? "HR resources" is redundant. Such arrogance.