> If people don't like what the 1st says, they should propose a new amendment, not try to pretend they can ignore what it currently says. That ship sailed a lo

> If people don't like what the 1st says, they should propose a new amendment, not try to pretend they can ignore what it currently says. That ship sailed a long time ago. One interesting thing about 1st amendment interpretation is that actual political speech (which pretty much everyone agrees was the point of the 1st amendment) is significantly more restricted than pornography even though pornography's"lack of restrictions" is justified on the basis that it is political speech....