3 ms·
Sure but I think that's the spirit it's meant in. I.e. why is it hard for companies to mostly have one cash cow and not develop several. Or why is it hard for
by ThomPete 11y ago
Sure but I think that's the spirit it's meant in.
I.e. why is it hard for companies to mostly have one cash cow and not develop several. Or why is it hard for them the develop a new business as old ones die out.
- ktRolster 11y agowhy is it hard for companies to mostly have one cash cow and not develop several In other words, why can't more companies be like Apple? Or Oracle, or Microsoft, for that matter.
- Pica_soO 10y agoBecause the cash cow has a say in everything. Tablett? Put the cash cow on it. Mp3 Player? Cash Cow it. If there is one lesson to take from all this, once something had success - it should be held far away from anything new developing. If they want to give a prototype bovine-cash-madness - it should happen completely independent from the actual prototype and have no effect on the evaluation of said prototype.