7 ms·
>alcohol makes someone more confident, or more likely to do stupid things. Reminds me of the "say the alphabet backwards" challenge that cops often present in
by sudojudo 10y ago
>alcohol makes someone more confident, or more likely to do stupid things.
Reminds me of the "say the alphabet backwards" challenge that cops often present in sobriety tests.
Drunk: ZYX... ZYXW... wait-wait... okay, ZYXTW, ummm...
Sober: I can't do that.
Stoned: Oh whaaat? No way, man. I can't even do that sober - shit, I mean...
- PhasmaFelis 10y agoYeah, I've heard that it's supposed to be a gotcha, and the "actual" test is that only drunk people will attempt it, while sober people will, allegedly, refuse to try. Because refusing to obey a police officer who's considering arresting you is such a sober decision.
- zzz157 10y agoBut I know my alphabet backwards. If sober, and I state it perfectly, will they think I'm drunk?
- duderific 10y agoDeep in my memory banks I have the recollection of a song "Backwards Alphabet", maybe it was on Sesame Street or something, that would allow you to "sing" the alphabet backwards without actually having to think about it; the melody acts as a mnemonic device to go along with the "lyrics" which are just the alphabet backwards. I wonder how a cop would react if you started singing the alphabet backwards.
- civilian 10y agoI don't know about you, buy my drunken singing is noticeably different than my sober singing.
- ams6110 10y agoThe request is usually accompanied by "without singing" because they definitely know this trick. In fact I think it's mostly not a test they use, or if it is it's to see how the person handles it, not that they can actually do it.
- giancarlostoro 10y agoI can't do it sober, and I'm always sober these days. I find that test awkward.
- Matt3o12_ 10y agoWhy do cops do that in America anyways? Isn't it much more secure to always use a breathalyzer. It only takes a few minutes and you can drive on. I'm also quite sure that you could train for soberty tests (if they are as "unusual" as saying the alphabet backwards) when you're drunk so the cops think you're under the legal limit.
- badlucklottery 10y ago>Isn't it much more secure to always use a breathalyzer. The field sobriety and breathalyzer tests are just excuses to get suspected DWIs into the drunk tank nowadays. Once there they'll draw blood for drug and blood-alcohol testing. That's the test that will be used in court if it gets that far. >I'm also quite sure that you could train for soberty tests Not a doctor but I don't know that you could fake out a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_sobriety_testing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_sobriety_testing
- zzz157 10y agoBecause is you fail a "field sobriety test", it doesn't matter if you fail a breathalyzer, you get arrested for DUI/DWI anyway. So they do the field sobriety test first, then the breathalyzer after, so they have two chances of having a reason to arrest you.
- Matt3o12_ 10y agoBut would their sobriety test hold up in court or what happens when you fail their field test (but pass the other test). If it doesn't hold up in court (because the scientific tests confirmed sobriety), why would they even bother doing both tests? As far as I know, breathalyzer are far more accurate (less false negatives and positives). This makes me wonder why they would even consider doing the other test. They could catch actual drunk drivers with the time saved and have less work to do (because they don't need to file out paper work for sober drivers).
- zzz157 10y agoAs far as holding up in court, I'm not sure. But most cases never go to trial, and a plea agreement is simply made.