2 ms·
Indeed, you can consider x86 to be an instruction compression scheme in which case it is a net win for caching (though minor). What Intel had for years was a p
by xenadu02 10y ago
Indeed, you can consider x86 to be an instruction compression scheme in which case it is a net win for caching (though minor).
What Intel had for years was a process advantage. Apple would have paid a premium for that. Not desktop CPU premium, but a premium nonetheless. And Intel wouldn't be a distant also-ran in the mobile SoC space.
If you read the Oral History of x86 documents the same arguments almost killed the first few Intel CPUs. The memory guys were worried they'd offend their memory customers and CPUs were not a high volume or high margin business.
- jonstokes 10y agoYeah, code bloat (vs. CISC) was a common knock against RISC early on, but as cache sizes have ballooned there's pretty much no effective difference at this point.