3 ms·
The headline is simply a lie. The study basically showed that you cannot measure whether someone is stoned by testing their blood for THC. The blood test only p
by lukeschlather 10y ago
The headline is simply a lie. The study basically showed that you cannot measure whether someone is stoned by testing their blood for THC. The blood test only proves they were stoned at some point in the past few weeks.
The study did not show that it's safe to drive while stoned, and if you read the entire article they're fairly clear about that.
- mywittyname 10y ago> The study did not show that it's safe to drive while stoned, and if you read the entire article they're fairly clear about that. Which is exactly what I can't argue with. My point was in reference to the conclusion of the article, which states, > So, should we all assume that we're safe to blaze one and go for a joyride whenever the whimsy strikes us? Absolutely not. There's plenty of evidence showing that marijuana use impairs key driving skills. If you get really stoned and then get behind the wheel, you're asking for trouble. We apparently cannot map concentrations of THC to driver impairment. Which agrees with my anecdotal experience in the matter, that the effects THC vary greatly with individuals.