3 ms·
> ...building cheap homes, say at 120k a pop... Cheap homes are $20k a pop. $10k for materials, and $10k for contracted labor. If you allocate another $20k f
by logfromblammo 11y ago
> ...building cheap homes, say at 120k a pop...
Cheap homes are $20k a pop. $10k for materials, and $10k for contracted labor. If you allocate another $20k for the land itself, and completing utility connections to it whenever they do not already exist, that's $40k total.
If you had $240M to spend each year, you could build 5000 houses every year, and have $40M left over for rudimentary commercial strips, administrative buildings, libraries, schools, firehouses, and cop shops.
You could stamp out a new municipality every year in 10 undeveloped adjacent square-mile survey sections. 6400 acres would be 5000 for the houses, and 1400 for the commons and businesses. You don't even need to go as far as Mississippi from SF. There are huge tracts of undeveloped land on the Great Plains between I-25 and I-35. They're actually cheaper than Mississippi, mostly because they have a less reliable fresh water supply.
- mcguire 11y ago"...because they have a less reliable fresh water supply." Congratulations! You've reinvented the reservation system!
- logfromblammo 11y agoNow the only problem would be getting them from SF to the new town. There would have to be some kind of road of wretchedness, or boulevard of bitterness, or something...
- DrScump 11y agoIf you allocate another $20k for the land itself The tricky part is finding those $20K plots of land in SF.