3 ms·
> And so much of it is personal This is true of drunk driving too. I don't think that means we just shouldn't try to impose any restrictions...
by bostonpete 10y ago
> And so much of it is personal
This is true of drunk driving too. I don't think that means we just shouldn't try to impose any restrictions...
- Broken_Hippo 10y agoThat is true, but like the article stated, there is much more relation and science affirming the connection between BAC and an impaired ability to drive than there is due to pot. And I'm sure that there are plenty of people that simply don't get caught, and more that would otherwise not get caught if it weren't for checkpoints. If we don't have the science, technology, nor a fair way to test, I'm not sure how making pot-specific laws is going to help do anything other than make people feel like something has been done. At least with better controls and better general laws, it makes everyone safer. People that can't drive accordingly, regardless of any drug, probably shouldn't be driving at all.