3 ms·
That's why I prefer Ruby over Python. It unifies loops and iterators using closures. At the same time the syntax "pretends" to be simple so that you can start u
by wedesoft 17y ago
That's why I prefer Ruby over Python. It unifies loops and iterators using closures. At the same time the syntax "pretends" to be simple so that you can start using Ruby straight away without having to understand continuations and closures. But I think a language which manages to hide the complexity of monads without removing them will blow Clojure out of the water.
- copper 17y ago> I think a language which manages to hide the complexity of monads without removing them Hm, I'm not sure this is possible: a great part of the "complexity" of monads is because it's a similar (and fairly simple!) structure that applies to a great many apparently unrelated concepts: function sequencing, backtracking, and what have you.