3 ms·
My kids run it on their X201s. The Windows 10 version is massively faster, providing really fast rendering. Minecraft 1.9 doesn't even seem to support setting t
by MichaelGG 10y ago
My kids run it on their X201s. The Windows 10 version is massively faster, providing really fast rendering. Minecraft 1.9 doesn't even seem to support setting the fullscreen resolution, so it's always pushing 720p. I'm not kidding when I say it's literally unusable: 1 frame per several seconds.
Unfortunately the W10 version is very cut down, lacking lots of things. It's possible the main difference is OpenGL v DirectX on the Intel integrated cards. But the graphics are basic enough that there should be some way to render them quickly regardless.
- kpil 10y agoI must admit that I have not played Minecraft on any computer without a fast nVidia card. It could be the OpenGL driver that makes it slow in your case actually. I am not sure that the graphics are "basic" in the technological sense - Yes, the graphics have a retro-pixel look and no fancy shader-tricks, but there are a lot of large views and a lot of surfaces, and no cheating with a world box.