3 ms·
Of course. It's the extreme of what is ultimately a scale. Unrestricted capitalism is similar: a completely free market will lead to a loss in freedoms. Slavery
by jwdunne 10y ago
Of course. It's the extreme of what is ultimately a scale. Unrestricted capitalism is similar: a completely free market will lead to a loss in freedoms. Slavery is humans as a commodity. If that isn't allowed, a market is not free. That's the most extreme case. A lesser case is what happens when there is no slavery but not enough regulation on competition: Standard Oil.
The problem really is black and white thinking. The best thing for humanity is balance. Kids and less fortunate shouldn't be forced to do hard labour for either nothing or next to nothing. Smart, hard working people should be rewarded for their contributions.
What about a smart, hard working kid who has a poor family? Let them shine by preventing poverty from being so crushing we lose out on a talented mind.
There's nothing wrong with regulation or business or markets or rights. We shouldn't fear any of those as they are merely economic tools that can be used to benefit society as a whole. By taking one or the other to the extreme, we're faced with a dangerous case of hammer-nail.
- pm90 10y agoI don't understand why this comment is being downvoted. I agree with the premise wholeheartedly: any ideology taken to the extreme is horrible and creates more problems than it intends to solve. Most Western countries today are capitalist and yet have some form of socialist programs and laws to prevent the unrestricted expansion of capitalism to such an extent that it becomes a liability to society rather than benefiting it.