2 ms·
Very true. Now you mention it, I wonder why, given the awesome power of extensibility, this hasn't been improved? Shouldn't it be trivial to write a DSL that ma
by jwdunne 10y ago
Very true. Now you mention it, I wonder why, given the awesome power of extensibility, this hasn't been improved? Shouldn't it be trivial to write a DSL that makes string handling almost, if not as good as, Perl et al?
- TeMPOraL 10y agoIt is, which is probably why nobody bothered to put it in a library before. But you have CL-PPCRE, which is arguably the most performant and one of the most solid implementation of Perl-compatibile regular expressions out there.