3 ms·
Interesting article but I feel it's light on actual hard data comparisons. One fact is wrong though. > Startups can achieve massive scale quickly, because th
by igravious 10y ago
Interesting article but I feel it's light on actual hard data comparisons.
One fact is wrong though.
> Startups can achieve massive scale quickly, because the domestic market is 1.3 billion people, which is four times the U.S. or European population.
I don't know what definition of Europe (Western maybe?) gives you 300 million people. Demographically Wikipedia says Europe had 70 million people in 210 so presumably it's over 3/4 billion now.
I feel like people don't appreciate that Eastern Europe / Russia is Europe too for a lot of definitions of Europe. The E.U. includes a lot of Eastern European countries and Balkan states and Slavic states but not all. Ukraine and Russia _are_ European in many respects, be it ballet, opera, classical music, theatre, cinema, religion, architecture, you name it. Arguably modern Turkey is the least European _culturally_ because of the influence of Islam and Arab culture but geographically Istambul is closer to Rome than London is and when the Western Roman Empire fell the seat of power shifted to Constantinople and continued on for another, I don't know, more than _500_ years anyway.
Wikipedia say Europe had 300 million people in 1916, midway during the First World War (sorry world!), exactly one century ago.
side note: I have to chuckle to myself when some point out that air pollution in China will be a limiting factor. It didn't stop the industrial revolution in the UK or US so why should it stop China? And it wasn't _that_ long ago that air pollution was a real problem for London and LA, for instance. Judging by history air pollution will be a thing of the past within one generation (25/30 years) in China. You can quote me on that.
- igravious 10y agoAaargh. That 70 should read 740 :( 740 million. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Europe
- studentrob 10y ago> side note: I have to chuckle to myself when some point out that air pollution in China will be a limiting factor. It didn't stop the industrial revolution in the UK or US so why should it stop China? And it wasn't _that_ long ago that air pollution was a real problem for London and LA, for instance. Judging by history air pollution will be a thing of the past within one generation (25/30 years) in China. You can quote me on that. I can think of a few factors that make Beijing different from the industrial revolutions of the US/UK. (1) In 2016, the brightest can move to pollution-free zones which don't really exist in urban China (2) Environmental policies were spurred on by environmental activism which was enabled by free speech. It's not clear this will happen in China. They keep saying the air quality will get better, but each year is worse than the last, and more and more rivers are no longer usable due to intense pollution. I think there's something to be said for the whole country being responsible and being able to protest about local conditions. That said, I wish China luck.