4 ms·
It's really interesting to look at the trends of the covers. If you start looking in the 1930's, you have occasional military themed covers, but primarily civi
by decode 17y ago
It's really interesting to look at the trends of the covers.
If you start looking in the 1930's, you have occasional military themed covers, but primarily civilian themes: http://books.google.com/books/serial/wzsEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1&lr=&sa=N&start=810 http://books.google.com/books/serial/wzsEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1...
Then, starting in December of 1940, you only get military themed covers. Between December of 1940 and December 1945, you get exactly two non-military images on the covers (Jun 1944 and Mar 1945), but both have prominent war themed text on them. January 1946 is the first fully civilian cover in over 5 years.
It really makes me realize how distant war seems to us now, even though the US has been involved in international wars for most of the last 60 years. Imagine if PopSci had images of Iraq and Afghanistan on the cover of every issue today.
- fnid2 17y agoThe difference between WWII and the wars of the next 60 years is that WWII was one the people rallied behind. The American people have never supported a war since then.
- acg 17y agoSome accounts of history don't have Americans backing the war until 1942. It could indeed be that WWII changed the way we looked at war and little to do with popular support.