4 ms·
Well in the past ownership in shares were linked to pieces of paper. So moving everything around in a 1:1 relation with the real trades is annoying. Much easier
by rtpg 10y ago
Well in the past ownership in shares were linked to pieces of paper. So moving everything around in a 1:1 relation with the real trades is annoying. Much easier to just move things in bulk at the end of the day.
The ownership layer mechanisms are not ways to make more money, but ways to spend less money. It's like how if we're both using the same broker to buy/sell the same stock, the broker could just... Change his records and not actually do any trading.
Though now some layers could be simplified, at one point they stop being middlemen and start being offerers of liquidity. Or something. Is your bank a middleman for mixing your dollars with other people's dollars?
- someguydave 10y ago>Is your bank a middleman for mixing your dollars with other people's dollars? Yes? That seems pretty obvious to me. Mingling segregated accounts is certainly a bad idea if the customer thinks that you have a bailment contract: https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Fractional_reserve_banking https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Fractional_reserve_banking