3 ms·
I don't think so. I think by virtue of having a GC language you pretty much have to manually anchor pointers before calling code which knows nothing of the GC.
by jjnoakes 10y ago
I don't think so. I think by virtue of having a GC language you pretty much have to manually anchor pointers before calling code which knows nothing of the GC.
But if anyone knows of counter examples, I would be interested in them as well.
- klibertp 10y ago> you pretty much have to manually anchor pointers before calling code which knows nothing of the GC. Which I'd still consider trivial...
- jjnoakes 10y agoI wouldn't. Trivial to me means a call to a C routine looks and feels like a call to a native routine. Manually managing the memory that the GC "owns" doesn't fit the bill in my definition.