>Personally I feel that if we had more data over a larger group of people we would be able to learn what leads to disease better. The article is pretty much ar

>Personally I feel that if we had more data over a larger group of people we would be able to learn what leads to disease better. The article is pretty much arguing that there isn't currently a method that exists that will accurately give us more data. How useful is "more data" when 73% of it is garbage?