3 ms·
Odd but not too rare, unfortunately. I've seen countless articles about the contents of a photograph or piece of art that did not include an image of any type.
by SerLava 10y ago
Odd but not too rare, unfortunately. I've seen countless articles about the contents of a photograph or piece of art that did not include an image of any type. Puzzling.
- anonymfus 10y ago> about the contents of a photograph or piece of art That often happens because of copyrights.
- nsxwolf 10y agoHow can that be? That sounds like the most uncontroversial example of fair use.
- developer2 10y agoYou start by searching for an image that has been released in the public domain or made available under a permissive license. If you can't find one, you can create your own. In this case, the orbit information itself isn't going to be copywritten, so of course you can scribble one out on your own. It's another thing entirely to just google for an existing image and use it without consent.
- desdiv 10y agoFair use doesn't apply everywhere in the world. >Fair use is a legal doctrine only in the United States.[0] In the UK, for example, their fair dealing exception is only for "non-commercial research or study, criticism or review". [1] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing_in_United_Kingdom_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing_in_United_Kingdom...
- sandebert 10y agoThe term "fair use" seems to only exist in the United States, but the same concept exists in more places. Such as Sweden, for instance, where it's called "skäligt bruk". https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use