3 ms·
Already posted in original form: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11688061 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11688061 I don't know why SMH would take a
by exodust 10y ago
Already posted in original form: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11688061 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11688061
I don't know why SMH would take a Washington Post story and change the title to something stupid, while keeping everything else the same, but that's what they've done.
Wait.. there's one more difference. A pathetic picture of "an AI".
"an AI"? Seriously SMH, just use the original title. Your editorial blundering is embarrassing, and could easily be replaced with "an AI" tasked with re-wording headlines.
- oarsinsync 10y agoThanks for that, the original article was a much better read.
- exodust 10y agothe original has the sample interaction with students, so its definitely worth switching, otherwise its the same copy apart from butchered title. SMH is a bottom of barrel source. Changing a story title to something more click-baity, sums up the entire Fairfax network and Australian news media in general.
- dang 10y agoOk, we changed the URL to that from http://www.smh.com.au/technology/innovation/professor-reveals-to-students-that-his-assistant-was-an-ai-all-along-20160513-gou6us.html http://www.smh.com.au/technology/innovation/professor-reveal....