2 ms·
If I'm understanding the article, there was a net increase of 2400 jobs in the quarter. That's still pretty good. (Edit: it may seem gloomy by comparing to 20
by thedevil 10y ago
If I'm understanding the article, there was a net increase of 2400 jobs in the quarter. That's still pretty good. (Edit: it may seem gloomy by comparing to 2015, which seemed like an extremely good year). I googled a little because I was curious and found this:
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends/percapita http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends/percapita
San Jose #1, that looks good. Although San Francisco....
- r00fus 10y agoAre these postings or actual jobs filled?
- thedevil 10y agoI assumed postings but not sure. It's just the most interesting google result I got looking around on this. Edit: I meant that my indeed link was about postings. My assumption was that the 2400 figure (800/month) from the article was net jobs added, not postings.
- esmi 10y ago"Vitner's analysis of state employment data showed that Bay Area tech firms added only 800 jobs a month in the first quarter of 2016" I was going to post the same thing as your parent post but I think the source is state data so probably not postings. Maybe that what the numbers in the DE9C are for...