3 ms·
I've been experimenting with Stanford's CoreNLP to identify named entities for analyzing RSS feeds and I was really impressed by how well it worked, having know
by writeslowly 10y ago
I've been experimenting with Stanford's CoreNLP to identify named entities for analyzing RSS feeds and I was really impressed by how well it worked, having known nothing about the state of NLP research before I started. Especially things like being able to identify coreferences.
- yolesaber 10y agoYes, I've used that before. I'm currently using Textacy for python which is also really good. However, extracting the named entities from a sentence is still a ways off from determining what's the subject of the sentence, although it gives a good indication. Using NER + quality POS tagging and tree building should do the trick for me I think.
- fatimafouda 10y agoAre you using BOW for sentiment analysis? Also, have you tried tinkering with Watson's sentiment analyzer? I'm working on a project that analyzes sentiment from speech, and I've been meaning to start on text sentiment analysis, but I'm not sure where to start.
- yolesaber 10y agoI'm using VADER - https://github.com/cjhutto/vaderSentiment https://github.com/cjhutto/vaderSentiment - because it's trained on NYT data which makes it suitable for news sentiment parsing. The code is pretty readable but relies heavily on a ruleset which might need to be tweaked for one's need.
- nostrademons 10y agoI was actually pretty disappointed with the NER in CoreNLP - I fed a few articles (including this one) into it, and while it's impressive that a computer can do this at all, it's pretty far away from being able to build a usable product. It seems to over-recognize Persons, for example - Parsey McParseFace was tagged as a person, as were Alice and Bob, as was Tesla (in another article), and while all of these are understandable, they weren't the intended meanings in the articles. I was also pretty disappointed with the date parser: while it gets some tricky ones like "Today" and "7 hours ago", it misses very common abbreviations like 7m or 7min or even "7min ago".
- nl 10y agoThe state of NLP tools generally is much lower than most people think. People think it is much easier than it is. For the date parser you want http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/sutime.html http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/sutime.html The code and rules aren't fun to customize though.
- nostrademons 10y agoYeah, I looked at SuTime, but it fell down on many common cases (the CoreNLP online demo is actually integrating SuTime into the annotations it produces). Another option is Natty [1], but it also seems to fail on the same examples. Natty at least has an ANTLR grammar that's reasonably easy to understand, though. [1] http://natty.joestelmach.com/ http://natty.joestelmach.com/
- nl 10y agoI know of one large group that switched (from Timen[1]) to Heideltime[2] because of multi-language support. One day someone will build a neural net model to do this rather than hand written rules. [1] https://github.com/leondz/timen https://github.com/leondz/timen [2] https://github.com/HeidelTime/heideltime https://github.com/HeidelTime/heideltime
- TeMPOraL 10y agoThanks 'nl, 'nostrademons and 'rcpt for the links! I've been using Chronicity[0] in my project, and I hand-hacked a Polish-to-English regexp "translator" to make it work with Polish language[1]. I'll be looking at the sources of the libraries you provided as well as papers they reference; maybe I'll manage to steal some code :). [0] - https://github.com/chaitanyagupta/chronicity https://github.com/chaitanyagupta/chronicity [1] - it's surprising how easy is to get 80% there with hacks like these: https://github.com/TeMPOraL/alice/blob/master/language.lisp#L123 https://github.com/TeMPOraL/alice/blob/master/language.lisp#...
- rcpt 10y agoHeideltime is the best date tagger I've used. Handles multiple languages better than anything else and fits inside uima https://github.com/HeidelTime/heideltime https://github.com/HeidelTime/heideltime