3 ms·
When 1200 baud was fast there were no pleas to use simple html - there was no html! You might have had me with 56k or even 28.8kbps (V.92!), but 1200 baud. Whe
by mbreese 11y ago
When 1200 baud was fast there were no pleas to use simple html - there was no html!
You might have had me with 56k or even 28.8kbps (V.92!), but 1200 baud. When 1200 baud was fast - yes, everywhere was simple text on the screen (maybe ANSI colors), but more along the lines of Compuserve or a BBS. And yes, you had to download images. The best were the progressive scan ones where you could view the incomplete images as they downloaded.
Ah, the memories...
- bphogan 11y agoI had a 28.8k modem. But my internet connection was rural, and 1200 baud. It was possible.
- mbreese 11y agoI believe it, but that wasn't considered fast at the time. And your point is definitely valid - there were web page size optimizations done with dial-up users in mind. I even remember programs that simulated loading time at different download speeds. But around 1980, 1200 baud was considered lightning fast! Imagine the jump from 300 to 1200 baud. But back then, HTML wasn't even a consideration and network connections were completely text-based sessions. If you were lucky, you had some control over colors. If you were lucky...
- bphogan 10y agoAll I'm saying is that when there were 28.8 modems, people in rural areas didn't always see those. In 1995. When you could do simple tables, images, and font colors. I remember it well because I worked with a rural ISP to make their web page.