3 ms·
I don't think the idea itself is so terrible - there are a lot of social networks that largely duplicate each others' functionality, and it would be great if ne
by ewjordan 17y ago
I don't think the idea itself is so terrible - there are a lot of social networks that largely duplicate each others' functionality, and it would be great if newcomers to the field could link in to a meta-network so that they were actually useful without building up huge userbases first. Facebook would have a lot less lock-in if I was able to build my own social service with some set of better features and people could choose to use it instead of Facebook, yet still reach everyone they used to interact with on Facebook without them all switching, too.
But...
OK, so my Facebook status, Twitter tweets, and Livejournal musings are all on this fancy standard
...and this might help somebody, somewhere, if any of those services were actually on this fancy standard.
I don't see any evidence that they are - I only see "Google Buzz, StatusNet, WordPress.com, and Tumblr have implemented some or all of these protocols today", which is a long shot from any true unification.
Or am I missing some other large set of supported sites?
- thristian 17y agoI believe this "OStatus" is the revamped, revised version of the OMB (Open Micro-Blogging) spec that Status.net/Identica introduced. Identica is naturally the biggest Status.net-based site, but apparently they have intranet microblogging systems too (Motorola is one customer they brag about). It's true that there's not many OStatus-based services around to link up yet, but similar ideas like OpenID took a while to get momentum too. I very much like the idea of a world where OStatus does for my social circle what RSS and Atom did for the websites I follow, and I wish the OStatus folk all the best in attempt to make my life better.