I agree, these tests are quite useless. In addition to the points above: 1. The huge variability in load times for various pages clearly depends much more on t

I agree, these tests are quite useless. In addition to the points above: 1. The huge variability in load times for various pages clearly depends much more on the page being loaded rather than the browser. 2. There is no discussion of what a meaningful test result might be. What does it mean if one browser is 10milliseconds faster than another in an artificial benchmark? 3. Some of the browsers couldn't successfully complete the benchmark, but were still included. 4. The overall winner is determined by the number of wins in each category. Internet explorer bombs on all the artificial bench marks, but loads real pages quite well. Because there are only 5 page load tests and 13 benchmarks, it loses badly. Honestly, which is more important?