There is an interesting conundrum here actually. So-called 'Western Philosophy' through most of its history has been largely concerned with the discovery of (p

There is an interesting conundrum here actually. So-called 'Western Philosophy' through most of its history has been largely concerned with the discovery of (perhaps just the discussion of) so-called 'transcendental' or 'absolute' truth -- truths that by definition are supposed to transcend culture. From a certain perspective, this is just a bias of this particular tradition of philosophy. However, to call it anything else but 'philosophy' -- say 'western philosophy' -- would be to, in an important sense, admit defeat. To respect diversity, I think you really do have to respect each tradition as distinct. I think mixing different philosophical traditions would end up failing to respect any of them. It'd be like having a dinner party meant to celebrate cultural diversity but throwing all the chinese, indian, and thai food together with burgers and ketchup and calling it 'diverse'. Western philosophy is it's own thing, as are other traditions. It doesn't need to let everyone in to respect them -- perhaps the contrary. Also I really don't like the way this article ends: “The Fates lead those who come willingly, and drag those who do not.”. The tone is threatening and has no place in a discussion of this nature.