4 ms·
Usually trademark infringement hinges on "likelihood of confusion" and there are factors that contribute/detract from that: http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/infr
by caseysoftware 10y ago
Usually trademark infringement hinges on "likelihood of confusion" and there are factors that contribute/detract from that: http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/infringe.html#factors http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/infringe.html#factors
I think it would be trivial for Google to demonstrate that this group is attempting to deceive the public to take advantage of the good will Google has and questionable behavior - like we have here - could negatively impact Google's brand.
- jessriedel 10y agoFrom that page (my emphasis): > In a nutshell, a plaintiff in a trademark case has the burden of proving that the defendant's use of a mark has created a likelihood-of-confusion about the origin of the defendant's goods or services. In this case, the defendant was not selling goods or services i.e., not engaging in trade.