3 ms·
Obviously, not all academics write like this. Not by far. It's the hallmark of various followers of postmodernists like Derrida and Lacan. Particularly favor
by jnbiche 10y ago
Obviously, not all academics write like this. Not by far. It's the hallmark of various followers of postmodernists like Derrida and Lacan. Particularly favored by far-left academics in departments of gender studies, multicultural studies, women's studies, etc.
Multiculturalism is a wonderful thing, but not the brand that these frauds sell.
You can read a pretty devastating critique of these pseudo-scholars in the book Fashionable Nonsense, which describes how two physicists made up a completely bullshit paper, full of utter nonsense, had it accepted for publication in one of the leading postmodernist journals of the time, and confronted a fierce but intellectually empty counterattack by postmodernism's supporters(this was in the 90s) [1].
1. http://www.amazon.com/Fashionable-Nonsense-Postmodern-Intellectuals-Science/dp/0312204078 http://www.amazon.com/Fashionable-Nonsense-Postmodern-Intell...
- Chris2048 10y agoThe leftist thing seems to be an attempt to ad academic legitimacy, borrowing the tradition of philosophy, while also making use of / abusing the tradition of ambiguity. The political advantage of this is never having to commit to saying anything concrete - a boon for practitioners of 'Motte and Bailey' rhetoric - http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/03/all-in-all-another-brick-in-the-motte/ http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/03/all-in-all-another-bric... . That said, I find this is more the case with lit crit, than philosophy. Perhaps in Academic Feminism?