3 ms·
I agree that reasoned and clear debate is the best approach. I've tried to make the case 'pro' by citing the impact of PageRank/MapReduce/GFS, and suggesting t
by justinsb 17y ago
I agree that reasoned and clear debate is the best approach. I've tried to make the case 'pro' by citing the impact of PageRank/MapReduce/GFS, and suggesting that the impact is no less than reshaping the way we think about computing.
So what are the (non-anecdotal) examples of the costs? It's also important to put those costs into context, because everything has negative unintended consequences in the real world. What's the total annual expenditure on patent litigation benchmarked against (for example) medical malpractice cases? Which companies have been shut down by patent trolls benchmarked against (for example) the companies shut down by new environmental legislation? Which inventions are available on some platforms and not others (e.g. ClearType), and what's the productivity cost of them benchmarked against (say) not pursuing remedies against the Microsoft monopoly?
- greyfade 17y agoSee this book for a complete discussion on these topics and more: http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/papers/imbookfinalall.pdf http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/papers/imbookfinalall.pdf That book weighs all of the costs and perceived benefits of patents form every angle in every industry and makes a very fascinating conclusion.