2 ms·

I think the point is that it would be renamed /parallax-plugin2.js and HTML would be set to reference that instead? That is why immutable cache shouldn't work f

by Ciantic 10y ago

I think the point is that it would be renamed /parallax-plugin2.js and HTML would be set to reference that instead? That is why immutable cache shouldn't work for the page in the address bar.

JoshTriplett 10y ago
The concern here is that even after recovery from the compromise, the site could then never use the name "parallax-plugin.js" again, because a browser might have the cached malware under that name instead of the correct version.
- jakub_g 10y ago
  On top of that you as a developer would have to understand what's happening and that it's happening at all. Might be not easy as we have a habit on clearing our cache all too often :)