4 ms·
Yes, 'cal 16' is ambiguous (is it 0016, 1916, 2016? Different software may return different answers). Without an explicit flag that should be used in a script,
by d0mine 10y ago
Yes, 'cal 16' is ambiguous (is it 0016, 1916, 2016? Different software may return different answers).
Without an explicit flag that should be used in a script, the dwim behavior (2016) seems more appropriate for the interactive use.
- gkya 10y agocal 16 unambiguously refers to 16 a.d. Don't forget that we include an apostrophe before a shortened year.