3 ms·
> something that DRM isn't preventing you from doing something you're otherwise not supposed to be doing anyways. And what would that be?
by MajesticHobo 10y ago
> something that DRM isn't preventing you from doing something you're otherwise not supposed to be doing anyways.
And what would that be?
- Karunamon 10y agoRecording it. It's a stream, you're paying $company for the rights to access content over the wire. Recording that isn't a right, legal or moral.
- MajesticHobo 10y agoI was under the impression that you are generally allowed to record content for your own personal use, as long as you don't distribute it to others.
- tremon 10y agoSee, and that's the problem with implementations like this. Recording this is perfectly legal in NL.
- serge2k 10y ago> Recording that isn't a right, legal or moral Recording a netflix show so I can watch it later doesn't seem like at all a moral issue, so long as I keep my subscription. Adding DRM also gives them the "You had to break DRM to do this" which is a handy argument to have.
- dwaltrip 10y agoYou do recognize that a large percentage of the population heavily disagrees with you about this? The concept of ownership regarding pieces of information or data (music or a video can be thought of as a piece of information or data) is far from settled.