Prior to its deletion for reasons unknown, there was a post that (reading between the lines) was calling you out on the term "access", which doesn't appear to e

Prior to its deletion for reasons unknown, there was a post that (reading between the lines) was calling you out on the term "access", which doesn't appear to encompass writing: http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#3.1 http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#3.1 I'd class that as a valid quibble, if my interpretation is correct, but a quibble nonetheless. The general intent is clear enough from the standard, I think: http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.7.2.1p18 http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.7.2.1p18 Further reading on the subject of undefined behaviour (apropos of nothing in particular): http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#3.4.3p1 http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#3.4.3p1, http://robertoconcerto.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/strict-aliasing.html http://robertoconcerto.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/strict-aliasin..., https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/boring-crypto/48qa1kWignU/o8GGp2K1DAAJ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/boring-crypto/48qa1kWi..., http://blog.metaobject.com/2014/04/cc-osmartass.html http://blog.metaobject.com/2014/04/cc-osmartass.html