3 ms·
It's people like Grubber and you that want a clear cause-and-effect. To them, the iPhone was the genesis and everything that's mobile and touch derives from it.
by martythemaniak 17y ago
It's people like Grubber and you that want a clear cause-and-effect. To them, the iPhone was the genesis and everything that's mobile and touch derives from it. To me, this is a lot like people claiming Nirvana invented Grunge. No, there was a scene/movement, they were a part of it and they were the ones that hit it big and influenced it. But to claim anything more is a big mistake.
In order to defend your absurd "there would be no touch without Apple" stance, you're going to great lengths here - accusing multiple companies of successful espionage against Apple for years in a row. Instead, you could face that fact that there were many companies with touchscreen devices, that there was much research in the area (both by companies such as the MS with the Surface and various independent researchers) and technology like high-res capacitative (vs the older, cheaper, crappier resistive) screens were becoming more available.
- TimothyFitz 17y agoI'm not sure where the "there would be no touch without Apple" quote comes from (parent's parent may have edited) but I agree it's false. Trivially provable, since Apple did not invent multitouch, they purchased the company/guy who did, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FingerWorks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FingerWorks
- martythemaniak 17y ago"So the argument that these various contemporaneous iPhone-like devices would have happened without the iPhone is pretty weak" How many ways can one interpret that? Clearly, he thinks large-screened touch-based phones would not have existed without the iPhone.
- GHFigs 17y agoyour absurd "there would be no touch without Apple" stance Who are you quoting?
- halo 17y agoThey're using scare quotes to indicate a paraphrase.