2 ms·
> where the crime involved targeted other people on the premises That seems to be a key difference.
by brandonmenc 10y ago
> where the crime involved targeted other people on the premises
That seems to be a key difference.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> That seems to be a key difference. Well, its key in that people never have tort liability to themselves, so it would never come up otherwise. But, nevertheless, it illustrates that the idea that a property/business owner making conscious decisions that predictably attract crime to their premises bears some responsibility for the resulting harms is not at all foreign to our society.