4 ms·

The problem is that by definition, such bills would be endorsed by people without huge amounts of property and money, while being utterly condemned by the likes

The problem is that by definition, such bills would be endorsed by people without huge amounts of property and money, while being utterly condemned by the likes of Wal-Mart. That asymmetry only ever ends in one way.

codys 10y ago
And which "one way" is that?
- Aelinsaar 10y ago
  Given time, it ends in favor of the people with influence and money. They can experience setbacks, but they can literally afford to be a bit patient.