> how is it a "solution", rather than a severe indignity, to accept a regime that requires people to buy insurance policies on their own bodies? Wait. So raisi

> how is it a "solution", rather than a severe indignity, to accept a regime that requires people to buy insurance policies on their own bodies? Wait. So raising taxes to let your government take care of you is fine, but telling people they have to buy insurance to pay for their healthcare is egregious? Your objection makes no sense. They are on the same side of the coin. The only difference is that in a functioning marketplace there is competition to reduce costs.