While I agree that Forbes is much worse in this regard, I was referring to Fortune: >Heeding the call for traffic growth, Fortune has joined the growing ranks

While I agree that Forbes is much worse in this regard, I was referring to Fortune: >Heeding the call for traffic growth, Fortune has joined the growing ranks of publishers that are opening up its site to posts written by non-staff contributors. Each publisher has a slightly different approach, and Fortune is no different. The Time Inc. title draws from a 5,000-person contributor network who supply what Fortune digital editor Aaron Task calls “our op-ed page.” http://digiday.com/publishers/fortune-hopes-avoid-platform-publishing-pitfalls/ http://digiday.com/publishers/fortune-hopes-avoid-platform-p...