3 ms·
Also worth point out is the ability to modify the MSBuild file to use parallel build paths - assuming the dependency tree is fairly flat.
by angstrom 17y ago
Also worth point out is the ability to modify the MSBuild file to use parallel build paths - assuming the dependency tree is fairly flat.
- tpz 17y agoWhich, in case you didn't know, the MSFT build stack was able to do with C++ projects long before it could with C# projects. I wonder if wglb's referenced company would have liked to know that. ;)
- angstrom 17y agoTrue, last I checked MSBuild support for VC++ projects was lacking. I think their solution was to run the build through the visual studio command interface...hopefully it's gotten better.
- wglb 17y agoI am sure that they are well aware of this. The issue is that the total compute time to compile their build is significant, and significantly (several multiples of 2) reduced by going to c#. Compile time increases development costs, execute time increases hardware costs.