3 ms·
19. The power of desktop machines is a magnet that will reverse today's "everything onto the Web!" trend. Desktop power will inevitably drag information out of
by troystribling 17y ago
19. The power of desktop machines is a magnet that will reverse today's "everything onto the Web!" trend. Desktop power will inevitably drag information out of remote servers onto desktops.
20. If a million people use a Web site simultaneously, doesn't that mean that we must have a heavy-duty remote server to keep them all happy? No; we could move the site onto a million desktops and use the internet for coordination. The "site" is like a military unit in the field, the general moving with his troops (or like a hockey team in constant swarming motion). (We used essentially this technique to build the first tuple space implementations. They seemed to depend on a shared server, but the server was an illusion; there was no server, just a swarm of clients.) Could Amazon.com be an itinerant horde instead of a fixed Central Command Post? Yes.
Now the network 'edge' is physically the the carrier owned physical location nearest the end user. This suggests that edge will be moved to the physical location of the end user. Financially this makes sense since it would move some of the carrier hardware and compute costs to the customer thus lowering the service costs as well as decreasing latency. It could be the next step in development of the compute cloud.
- dejan 17y agoI believe he is talking about large scale, generalized p2p and finally merging the web app benefits with supercomputer's power of our desktops, coordinating power across the net, and having information "fly around" in cyberspace. sexy.
- troystribling 17y agoYes I agree he is talking about p2p. ISPs could start deploying devices on customer premises to provide caching, storage, compute and wireless network services. In densely populated areas this would essentially be a local CDN.