2 ms·
They have: they're cheaper, they've developed new technologies, and they're doing it privately. > That SpaceX's approach will be more suitable to future things
by odonnellryan 10y ago
They have: they're cheaper, they've developed new technologies, and they're doing it privately.
> That SpaceX's approach will be more suitable to future things is not a good counterargument.
No one is saying that, they're just being positive and looking forward to the future.
How is that bad?
- lmm 10y agoDoing things cheaper is good, sure. All I'm saying is that zupreme's original point is fair (they haven't (yet) really done anything concrete that NASA haven't (just done it cheaper), and the current enthusiasm is perhaps disproportionate)