3 ms·
"loosing credibility" is subjective in this case. Some orgs/people will be better off, some won't. I recall GitHub doing some extensive research on what their
by dommer 10y ago
"loosing credibility" is subjective in this case. Some orgs/people will be better off, some won't.
I recall GitHub doing some extensive research on what their customer based wanted. This is most likely the outcome of that research.
If I were to migration our org. over we would be worse off. Even with that I don't think this move is disingenuous. Poorly thought through perhaps?
- Xylakant 10y ago> Even with that I don't think this move is disingenuous. I never said that I consider the move disingenuous. Almost no change will unilaterally benefit everybody. I dislike the communication that reads as if the change is unilaterally beneficial - where it clearly is not.
- dommer 10y agoI didn't say you did. Well, I don't think I did. Either way, we agree it wasn't disingenuous. I'd also agree this change won't be beneficial to all. And GitHub is also allowing everyone to make a choice. "...you'll have at least 12 months notice before any mandated change to your plan."