16 ms·
A hypothesis has been put forward (no, not that CO2 has a warming effect: that's physical fact. It's the extent of that that is in question): no mathematical fu
by vixen99 11y ago
A hypothesis has been put forward (no, not that CO2 has a warming effect: that's physical fact. It's the extent of that that is in question): no mathematical function has been found to fit the observed data. Fact! Conclusion: the situation is much more complex than we currently understand and does not support the horribly destructive policies which are very much in the interests of a clique of politicians and folk with dependent jobs.
You again use the word 'deny'. Bruno Giordano and Galileo would understand that word entirely. Giordano paid the price for that by being burnt alive and Galileo saw discretion as the better part of valour. We can see that the use of the word reveals this is a religious debate.
- danieltillett 11y ago>no mathematical function has been found to fit the observed data. Fact! Conclusion: the situation is much more complex than we currently understand and does not support the horribly destructive policies which are very much in the interests of a clique of politicians and folk with dependent jobs. I don’t understand this thinking. The fact that we don’t have a good predictive model is extremely worrying. We may hit a non-linearity or positive feedback loop that increase the average temperature by 10C in a very short time (this is unlikely, but we can’t rule it out). The whole thing is like jumping off a cliff into the ocean when you have no idea what is under the surface.