3 ms·
Well it's used as a word in the mu koan. Might be archaic and not used in modern Chinese or Japanese, I don't know, but for 'mu' as the prefix we have (as far a
by roel_v 11y ago
Well it's used as a word in the mu koan. Might be archaic and not used in modern Chinese or Japanese, I don't know, but for 'mu' as the prefix we have (as far as I understand, which is admittedly not particularly deep) 'not'. 'Mu' as in 'your question is based on faulty premises' is the more useful form for Westerners, I'd argue.
- sdrothrock 11y agoThe koan in question is Chinese, not Japanese; Japanese allows for the reading of old Chinese with Japanese readings, but Japanese people won't understand it without specific knowledge of how to read Japanized Chinese, so it's in a really weird place in general -- it's definitely not something I'd call a "Japanese word," though.